This outfit is interesting Britney…

1) Because I had no idea that the S/S ’10 trend for cropped tops was still spilling over into November (and yes I know in the US it’s probably warmer than London, but whatever).

2) Because this particular cropped top probably wouldn’t have featured in any retailers collection, simply due to the fact it’s downright fugly and would look better in 1964 where it belongs.

And 3) because I’m so used to seeing Britney bra-less, smuggling peanuts under peach coloured vests, thinking that’s perfectly alright. Here’s the news…it’s NOT. I’ve seen more of Britney’s nipples than I care to (that goes out to you too Kim Kardashian, Armenia is actually thinking of adding them to its national delicacies ).

Magically though, Britney’s weave issues seem to be behind her (along with the fashion police) as she’s rocking wavy locks instead of a matted pile of dead threads on top of her head. Bless. But the roots could do with a look-in, or is that a box of DIY hair dye her bodyguard’s holding in that plastic bag? Let’s all pray now.

But heh, this is ‘new’ Britney, meaning she’s basically ditched the daisy dukes in favour of corduroy (once again best left in 1964) and just sheared off another pair of trews instead. And she has bra on. Hang on…SHE HAS A BRA ON?!! *notes day and date this unusual occurence happened*

Well she tried huh – and it’s not as eye bleeding as the variety of get-ups Paris Hilton has ripped the back of my eyeballs out with lately. So enough already with the Britney bashing…for today anyway.

Kate Lawson – Fashion Editor, Showbiz-i

Follow Kate @katelawson_